Generally requires very little work to get a noise free image and then reexports automatically to LR, where i finish off ppġ in 100 don't work well and smears but this is usually with a a very big crop and terrible quality rather than the noise aspect I import into LR and if needed use the Edit in function which takes me straight to Topaz Denoise. Tried several apps a bout a year ago for a variety of things including denoisingįor me DXO (at the time) was not to my taste in workflow It's good to have options for each of our needs. I also find the Dxo color science more accessible, particularly if you use their film sims. For some workflows (mine), that's a deal breaker. One big advantage here over Lightroom is not having to pay a subscriptions, and the fact Lightroom forces you to import from memory card before any edits. What I can say is that it's worth giving a try to unsharp mask settings on DXo and global lens sharp settings depending what you are trying to do. I a not impressed from what I have seen in reviews vs what Dxo can do, but I have not tried it myself. You can get good results with either if you know what you are doing, so quality is not a consideration. The Dxo workflow feels like I have one hand tied behind my back. I don't care about the other processing in Dxo as I use Lightroom. They both look good if you are looking at skin tones but the deep shadows of the background are much worse with Dxo. Batch processed about 100 files in Dxo and had to reprocess many of them in Denoise. But upon extensive use I have found that Denoise gives me better results using Clear, High, High option. Topaz DenoiseĪ few more fullsize samples: DXO DeepPrime vs. There is a link to the dropbox with all the samples (81 files in total):ĭXO HQ vs. Here you can find a set of full-size images (range from ISO64 - ISO25.600) comparing DXO (with different noise reductions: HQ-Fast - Prime - DeepPrime with Topaz Denoise): Often the Topaz Denoise results look unnatural to me In my tests, DXO DeepPrime was always superior to Topaz Denoise. 4x faster than the processing in Topaz Denoiseģ. On my setup with older mid-range graphics card (GeForce 1060GTX), the export in DXO (using GPU) is ca. Since Topaz only does denoise, you still need another program for the restĢ. My take (only comparing DeepPrime functionality vs Topas Denoise)ġ. What are thoughts after some (post the 3 week trial period!) use?Īs the others said, DXO is a complete RAW converter (one feature is DeepPrime), Topaz Denoise only does noise reduction. Choice between Topaz DeNoise AI vs DxO PhotoLab 4 DeepPRIME - does anyone have any thoughts which one is better?ĭoes one have weaknesses the other patches?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |